TEXAS NURSING PROFILE

Reflections of a Certified Global Nurse Consultant

Amanda Slagle, MPH, MSN, RN, CPHQ

Certified Global Nurse Consultant

For anyone who has travelled to a new country, the experience is often viewed as an adventure that promises exploration. Preparing for the trip brings excitement, perhaps mixed with a tinge of nervousness and anticipation of the unknown. However, travel motivated by the search for employment is not always accompanied by the same sense of promise. The stress of obtaining documents to verify one’s nationality, education, and work history, combined with the uncertainty of waiting for immigration processes and visa approvals to move forward, only begins to reflect the complexity encountered when one migrates to a new country for employment.

After living in the United States for most my life, I had the unique opportunity to live overseas for several years, and in that time, I experienced firsthand the complexity of trying to navigate other countries’ nursing licensure requirements. This experience has given me a profound and deep respect for any nurse who makes the leap to leave their place of birth to search for employment and maintain their license as a nurse.

Most American nurses would not consider seeking employment outside the United States as a necessity. Those who do often seek self-exploration such as experiencing and learning from a new culture. However, for many nurses around the world, migration for work is not a voluntary decision, it is essential. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 1 in 9 nurses globally work in a country other than the one in which they were born (WHO, 2020). The motivation to migrate for work is personal to each nurse, but for many, the decision is ultimately driven by economic necessity and the desire to financially support their families.

Nationally, internationally licensed nurses (ILNs), also referred to as foreign educated nurses, make up 5% of the workforce. In Texas, ILNs represented 11% of the Texas nursing workforce in 2023, more than doubling from 2018 (HRSA, 2026). This number may not be representative of only newly arrived ILNs, as Texas has experienced an overall population increase in the last several years, but the rise in nurses whose initial license was gained outside of the U.S. is emblematic of the global trend of nurses migrating away from their home country to work. This increase in ILNs in Texas is occurring despite the ongoing national anti-immigration rhetoric, driven in part by the inability of the U.S. educational pipeline to produce enough nurses to meet growing workforce demands.

Texas has the third largest population of people 50 years of age and older in the United States (Texas Demographic Center, 2025). As this aging population is expected to grow, the demand for skilled and licensed nurses in the home, hospital, and long-term care settings will continue to rise. The Texas Center for Nursing Workforce Studies estimates that by 2036, the demand for registered nurses (RNs) in Texas will exceed 50,000. This demand is amplified by the growing turnover and vacancy rates experienced in long-term care facilities which ranges anywhere from 25-50% (Texas Center for Nursing Workforce Studies, 2024).

The need to broaden nursing workforce solutions has long been identified by employers and patient advocates. ILN recruitment is one strategy employers consider when addressing the staff shortages. Particularly in the long-term care setting, immigrant healthcare workers play a critical role in patient care. In fact, emerging evidence suggests their presence may contribute to improved staffing stability and patient outcomes, including a reduction in death (Grabowski et al., 2026).

The recruitment of ILNs to staff critical and underserved areas is supported by leading healthcare organizations, including the American Organization for Nursing Leadership (2025). But even before the recent federal restrictions on visas, the immigration process was lengthy and complex, with many ILNs facing waits of up to four years to complete visa processing and receive employment authorization to work in the U.S. Due to this protracted process, employers frequently rely on international nurse recruitment agencies rather than hire ILNs directly. These recruiting agencies assist in identifying qualified nurses and are supposed to guide them through the credentialing, visa application, and migration processes.

Particularly in the long-term care setting, immigrant healthcare workers play a critical role in patient care.

Unregulated recruiting may lead to unethical practices

The topic of ethical recruitment and nurse migration may be new to some, but it has been a point of discussion in developing countries for years. Concerns of talent drain, or ‘brain-drain’ refers to nurses who obtain education in their country and leave to find employment in other countries that offer greater security and earning potential. The exodus of skills from developing economies leads to a mismatch of need and skill where the majority of the nurses in the world provide care to less than half of the world’s population (WHO, 2020). Tension and disagreement persist between who holds accountability for this misbalance, with destination (high-income) countries claiming the source country (low-middle income) are the cause because they do not provide the financial stability and robust labor markets that offer safe working environments. Whereas the source countries claim the destination countries lure or poach nurses away by offering salary and benefits that source countries cannot sustainably match. .

In response, the WHO authored the Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel (2010) to guide countries in creating legal and institutional frameworks on ethical recruitment practices. The more recent International Council of Nurses (ICN) position statement on ethical recruitment (2019) provides stronger guidance, outlining 12 principles for governments and employers to follow. Among these 12 principles, the position statement calls for regulation of recruitment, good faith contracting, equal pay for equal value, and effective orientation, mentoring and supervision.

Despite these global-wide efforts, the U.S. has no comprehensive federal framework specifically governing the ethical recruitment of ILNs. Although organizations like the American Association of International Healthcare Recruitment (AAIHR), a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy organization, offers membership to recruitment agencies that agree to follow ethical recruitment standards, there is no federal or state requirement that a recruiting agency must be affiliated with such an organization. Moreover, because the international nurse recruiting industry is largely self-regulated, with minimal external oversight, ethical recruitment practices in the U.S. are not well defined, let alone enforced.

The unregulated, potentially unethical recruitment of ILNs is a concern in the U.S. Due to the lack of national regulation, the scope of the problem pertaining to unethical recruitment remains unquantified. Although there are ongoing legal actions against healthcare employers and recruiting agencies for unjust and predatory labor conditions, many of the issues ILNs face are silenced because their contracts are subject to arbitration. Arbitration means that legal disputes are resolved privately through proceedings that are confidential; thus, outside of the public court system. As a result, allegations brought by ILNs related to unfair labor practices, coercive contract terms, and exploitation often remain unknown to the public. Because many arbitration proceedings are sealed, information that could help future ILNs evaluate the practices of recruiting agencies and employers may never become publicly available.

Despite the significant role these recruiting agencies play in facilitating migration and employment placement, they operate with minimal oversight. The responsibility falls on individual ILNs to navigate the pressures of relocating to a new country for employment, and if they choose to use a recruiting agency, there is no central authority responsible for verifying the agency’s ethical practices or publicly tracking legal actions brought against it. Some recruiting agencies require ILNs to pay application and processing fees in advance, signing contracts that financially bind them until they have “paid off” their debt. The financial obligations and contractual restrictions associated with these agreements place ILNs in an unequal bargaining position relative to recruiting agencies. This asymmetry is increased by the U.S. nursing workforce’s lack of explicit acknowledgement at the state and national level that recruitment of ILNs should align with ICN and WHO’s ethical standards.

Ethical recruitment creates a safe working environment

ILNs are not only professionals who have completed education and language training to obtain licensure in the U.S., they are also resilient and adaptable, demonstrating a capability to work in a new culture. However, the pressures of relocating to a new country are numerous and navigating the licensure process is one of many adjustments ILNs make as they enter the American healthcare system. Many ILNs come to the U.S. with years of work experience, often gained in more than one country. One’s national culture, as well as the culture of the work environment, plays a critical role in shaping a person’s professional work habits. As ILNs migrate to the U.S., they bring with them a cultural identity that contributes to the strength of the U.S. nursing workforce.

The experience ILNs gain outside of the U.S. healthcare system also highlights the importance of providing supportive mentoring as they transition to the U.S. It is understandable and expected that ILNs will bring professional practices developed in other healthcare systems that differ from those expected in the U.S. healthcare system. Just as a new RN requires orientation and support during the first years of their independent practice, so do ILNs. Some recruiting agencies offer ‘training or bridge programs’, to assist in this cultural transition, but there is no stipulation, again at the state or national level, that requires recruiting agencies to offer a training program. Furthermore, there is no curriculum or objectives created by any regulatory or accrediting body in the U.S. outlining what should be included in a cultural training program for ILNs. Some recruiting agencies may offer sophisticated, hands-on simulation practice labs to acclimated ILNs to the U.S. healthcare system while others may simply require an ILN to complete online modules while they sit in a hotel room or other housing waiting for employment paperwork to be completed.

The lack of uniform guidance and oversight to support ILNs professional and cultural transition to the U.S. healthcare system is contrary to what other developed economies such as the United Kingdom and Canada have created to support ILNs transition. In these two countries, bridging and mentoring curriculums have been created to guide the ILN, the employer and the healthcare team in learning how to work together. Another example is in Australia, where the Nursing and Midwifery Board approves accreditation standards and accredited courses of study for ILNs to support their transition to the new workplace environment.

In comparison, the U.S.’s National Council of State Boards of Nursing provides guidance on verifying an IENs credentials, focusing on concerns pertaining to fraud. There is no direction given to State Boards to adopt expectations of ethical recruitment standards or to inquire if recruiting agencies deliver cultural transition programs. Similarly, a review of publicly available American Nurse Association resources did not identify guidance focused on ethical recruitment practices, cultural transition programs for ILNs, or educational materials designed to help ILNs recognize potentially exploitative recruitment arrangements. The absence of such resources should not necessarily be interpreted as a lack of concern; rather, it may indicate that these issues have not yet received substantial attention within ANA’s current advocacy priorities. Collectively, these gaps in guidance from the nation's leading nursing organizations may contribute to inconsistent ethical recruitment and transition practices, with potential implications for workforce stability and patient safety. TruMerit, a private company performing credentialing of ILNs in the U.S., estimates that nearly 45% of ILNs in the U.S. may be recruited through agencies that do not adhere to recognized ethical recruitment standards (TruMerit/CGFNS, 2023). In the absence of national tracking, states and employers must fill the void. As a profession, we are ethically bound to ensure that our colleagues, including those from other countries, are recruited under transparent and fair practices. As an individual nurse, if you work somewhere that hires ILNs, advocate for them. Ask your employer if they provide ILNs with a cultural transition program and if they use ethical recruiting agencies. Consider developing a mentoring program, like new graduate mentoring, and provide the ILNs in your workplace with guidance as they learn a new culture as well as new work processes.

As a citizen, you can ask your Board of Nursing to make a public statement that outlines expectations for recruiting agencies to demonstrate ethical practices and provide cultural transition programs for the ILNs they recruit. By outlining expectations for recruiting agencies, Texas nurses can demonstrate leadership on the topic of ethical recruitment and the global issue of nurse migration. Promoting ethical recruitment and effective transition support not only benefits ILNs, but also strengthens workforce stability and helps create practice environments that support patient safety.

The recent political discourse unfolding over immigration in the U.S. appears new, but the reality is that America has long been without a national agenda on immigration. Regardless of one’s opinion about the topic, ILNs are a needed part of the nursing workforce, and employers, professional organizations and advocates for the aging recognize this need. Supporting ILNs transition and advocating for ethical recruitment practices is supporting the U.S. healthcare system. As ILNs fill critical shortage gaps and deliver care to our aging population, Texas nursing leaders have an opportunity to demonstrate leadership and vision in addressing the healthcare needs of its citizens by improving the oversight and accountability of those who recruit and hire ILNs. TN


References

American Association of International Healthcare. https://www.aaihr.org

American Organization for Nursing Leadership. (2025). AHA Urges Health Care Personnel Exemptions for H-1B Visa Changes. https://www.aonl.org/news/AHA-Urges-Health-Care-Personnel-Exemptions-for-H-1B-Visa-Changes

Grabowski, D. C., Gruber, J., & McGarry, B. E. (2026). Is immigration good for health? The effect of immigration on older adult mortality in the United States (Working Paper No. 34791). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34791

HRSA (2026). Nursing workforce dashboard. https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/nchwa/nursing-workforce-dashboard

International Council of Nurses (2019). Position statement on international career mobility and ethical nurse recruitment. https://www.icn.ch/system/files/documents/2019-11/PS_C_International%20career%20mobility%20and%20ethical%20nurse%20recruitment_En.pdf

National Council of State Boards of Nursing (2026). U.S. nursing licensure for internationally educated nurses. https://www.ncsbn.org/nursing-regulation/licensure/internationally-educated-nurses.page

Texas Demographic Center https://demographics.texas.gov/Projections/#pageContent

Texas Center for Nursing Workforce Studies. 2024 Nursing workforce infographic. https://www.dshs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/chs/cnws/WorkforceReports/2024_Infographic_Proof_Setup.pdf and Texas professional nursing trends: https://www.dshs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/chs/cnws/WorkforceReports/2019/2019_RegionalProfile_Statewide_FINAL.pdf)

TrueMerit/CGFNS (December, 2023) 2023 Nurse Migration Report.

World Health Organization (2010). Global code of practice on the international recruitment of health personnel. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-global-code-of-practice-on-the-international-recruitment-of-health-personnel

World Health Organization (2020). State of the World’s Nursing 2020: Investing in education, job and leadership. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892400032